July 2, 2023

Just so we're clear, the case that served as the springboard for SCOTUS's latest rollback of LGBTQ+ rights was evidently fabricated. And that's not all: the man whose name the plaintiff cited in the case has said he never made the request for service mentioned in the case, is in fact straight and has been married for 15 years (the document in which his request is mentioned dates to 2017: six years ago), and is a web designer and could thus design his own wedding website in any event. Chance that these revelations will move the court to overturn their decision: likely less than/equal to 0%. Whee!

 

"Smith [plaintiff] named Stewart — and included a website service request from him, listing his phone number and email address in 2017 court documents. But Stewart told The Associated Press he never submitted the request and didn’t know his name was invoked in the lawsuit until he was contacted this week by a reporter from The New Republic, which first reported his denial.

 

"'I was incredibly surprised given the fact that I’ve been happily married to a woman for the last 15 years,' said Stewart, who declined to give his last name for fear of harassment and threats. His contact information, but not his last name, were listed in court documents.

 

"He added that he was a designer and 'could design my own website if I need to' — and was concerned no one had checked into the validity of the request cited by Smith until recently."

 

Clicking on the image will take you to the article.